Crime Fiction – Ten Cliches to Avoid

Writing fiction is a bit like baking a cake. You need the right ingredients in the right amounts, or it will turn out awful. For fiction, you need the right blend of storyline, action, description and character growth to bring your story to life to your own reader.

Character development can be among the most important things about writing fiction. You want to create a realistic set of personalities to move your plot together and to do this you need to know them. But how much do you really have to know about these before you start writing?

Well, that depends on the kind of story you are writing. The period of your narrative will dictate the amount of character information you’ll have to create them come to life. For simplicity’s sake, I’ve broken my character sheet down into what I use for every kind of writing. Your character sheets may vary.

Fiction is an integral part of human life. Man has an inherent need for diversion to get away, even if for a few moments, in the temptations of life. Story telling has been among the first ways of accomplishing this and above the ages it’s grown into the diverse types of entertainment we have in today’s world. Entertainment is essentially of two kinds – active and passive. The active involves physical participation in 1 way or other, while the passive doesn’t. Fiction is basically a passive amusement though the mind has an important part within it. Fiction always involves visualization whether it’s covert or overt. The first type of overt visualization has been the enacting of dramas as the cultures developed. The development of technology introduced in its contemporary forms – cinema and tv. The key type is inherent to story telling and reading. It’s an inherent characteristic of the individual (or perhaps any) mind that a thought is always accompanied by an image. So when one reads or hears a story the brain visualizes the scene and the figures; this process continues throughout the narrative and often even after it has ended.

Fiction by its very definition is unreal. When we read a novel we are aware that the narrative and the characters in it are merely a product of creativity of the writer. When we see a film we know that the characters are only acting their parts basically pretending to be somebody besides themselves. Still we’re emotionally affected by the twists and turns in the narrative. We laugh, weep with them, and even feel indignant towards the bad men. The adorable hero or heroine might be despicable in real life and the protagonist may be a perfect gentleman, but we identify them using the characters they’re portraying. In essence for this brief period we ourselves get transported into the imaginary world of the author. Strangely enough this happens too with the author at least to a number of them. He or she goes through the very same emotions while writing and possibly later also. These few things to consider will make a difference in your information as they relate to Get the facts. There is a tremendous amount you truly should take the time to find out about. We feel you will find them to be beneficial in a lot of ways. Do take the time and make the attempt to discover the big picture of this. So we will provide you with a few more important points to think about.

“Knowledge is limited, imagination isn’t.” Albert Einstein explained that even though the wording of the next part could have been different. Einstein like any other human being was not infallible. A number of his views he held right until the end turned out to be wrong in the subject of physics. In this particular announcement also he seems to have it backwards. Knowledge might be limited in the case of someone but in general it is infinite even when we consider just logical knowledge leaving aside transcendental. Science in particular has shown this at each step in the course of its own development. Imagination pertains to an individual mind and can be constrained by numerous things depending on the situation of the individual. A mind can envision only what happens in some way to things already stored in it. Someone who has never been outdoors a remote location in jungle and has no contact with the world outside cannot imagine what metropolitan cities are like.

Getting back to fiction the imagination of the writer also has to be predicated on his direct or indirect encounters. In this sense fiction is based on reality and to this extent it represents another dimension of truth. Here of course we run into the philosophical problem of the precise significance of reality. There are two diametrically opposite viewpoints – materialistic and spiritualistic. In accordance with the prior only things that can be perceived through our senses are real, everything else is unreal. The latter asserts that there’s just one ultimate fact from which we perceive comes out and what that’s perceived is only an illusion. We look at a statement by Einstein: “Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a persistent one.” He was clearly referring to the fact of this phenomenal world. The word illusion can have different connotations but generally it means perceiving something rather different from what it really is. So the existence of the thing is a necessity for illusion, it isn’t a mental construction. Imagination is a mental phenomenon and has nothing to do with anything really existing. Therefore the connection between fiction and reality is entirely different from that between illusion and reality. It does take some time to write a complete story for any kind of book.

At a philosophical sense the phenomenal world itself may be regarded as fiction. This is what Shakespeare possibly meant when he wrote: “All the world’s a stage, and all women and men merely players”. We may also consider everything in the universe (space, time, matter) as players since everything has its own entry and exit. We naturally run into the problem of saying what the point is and who wrote the script. Shakespeare most probably believed in God, strict determinism, also in the reality of earth, so he did not have this problem. Now it is generally believed that the world also includes a beginning and will have an ending. If the world is also a participant, are there multiple universes or does it come alone on the platform then presents other players? But what is the stage in this case? Quantum physics points to a single possibility. At extremely small scales of space and time there’s a quantum emptiness that’s not really empty but filled with energy which is constantly transforming itself into virtual particles as well as back. What remains after the end of the universe could possibly be an infinite version of the quantum emptiness full of energy into which all the matter has converted itself. This universal energy is the origin of and background for everything.

It isn’t merely a philosophical point either. We invest a considerable part of our life from the imagined or fictional world. We muse about the things in long run and live over the past imagining what could have been. The imagination about the future is based on our hopes and aspirations and also to some extent it’s a positive in the sense we are in a position to mold our future if we sincerely try. But musing over the past is a futile exercise because we know for a fact that ‘what could have been’ is only fantasy that never happened. Still it serves the exact same function as fiction in the perspective of entertainment. We amuse ourselves by imagining how life would have been, knowing fully well that it has no reality whatsoever. In a metaphorical sense ago, at the distant past, is fiction. At a particular sense history itself is fiction as it invariably includes the subjective bias of the author. What we know of Buddha and Jesus now is more fiction than truth.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *